April 26, 2025 - 06:14
Colorado's second-highest court concluded last week that a Denver judge made "clearly erroneous" findings regarding a father's sobriety and his request for parenting time. The decision came after the father challenged the judge's ruling, which imposed strict conditions on his ability to spend time with his children. The appellate court found that the judge relied on unsupported facts when determining the father's fitness as a parent.
In its ruling, the court emphasized the importance of a fair assessment based on accurate information, particularly in cases involving child custody and parenting time. The father had argued that the judge's restrictions were not only unjust but also detrimental to his relationship with his children. The court's decision is seen as a significant step towards ensuring that parenting time disputes are resolved based on credible evidence rather than assumptions or inaccuracies.
This ruling highlights the necessity for judges to base their decisions on solid facts, especially when the well-being of children is at stake. The case serves as a reminder of the critical role that accurate information plays in family law proceedings.
